Biohacking Without the BS

Evidence-based biohacking protocols that actually work. No pseudoscience, no overpriced supplements, no guru worship — just actionable strat...
Cape Town, ZA
Created byProfile pictureTrent Harris
1 joined
Profile picture
Trent HarrisProfile picture@trentharriszn·Jun 10

The biggest lie in biohacking is that “more advanced” means better 🧬


A lot of people jump straight to peptides, hormones, GLP-1s, nootropics, fat-loss compounds, or “anti-aging” stacks before they understand the basics:


• What evidence actually supports this?

• Is it human data or animal data?

• Is it approved, off-label, experimental, or grey-market?

• What blood markers should be watched?

• What side effects are people ignoring?

• What happens if you stop?

• Is this solving the problem or just masking it?


The real skill in biohacking isn’t finding the most extreme compound.


It’s knowing how to think before you touch anything.


That’s why I built Biohacking Without the BS - not as a dosing guide, not as a cycle guide, and not as medical advice.


It’s a literacy system for understanding:

🧠 evidence quality

🩸 bloodwork

⚙️ hormones

🧬 peptides

💊 pharmaceutical interventions

⚠️ risk management

🚩 red flags and misinformation


Question:


What do you think is the most overhyped biohacking topic right now?


  1. Peptides

  2. Testosterone

  3. GLP-1s

  4. Nootropics

  5. Hair-loss meds

  6. Supplements


Comment your answer - I’ll make the next breakdown on the most common one.

Profile picture
Trent HarrisProfile picture@trentharriszn·Jun 9

Hot take: most people don’t actually need “more biohacks” 🧬


They need to understand what they’re already doing.


A lot of the biohacking space is just people jumping from one compound, supplement, peptide, or protocol to the next without ever asking basic questions:


• What problem am I actually trying to solve?

• Do I have bloodwork?

• Is there human evidence?

• Is this approved, off-label, experimental, or grey-market?

• What would make me stop?

• Am I fixing the cause or masking the symptom?


That’s why Biohacking Without the BS is built around literacy first.


Not protocols.

Not guru advice.

Not “take this stack and become limitless.”


Just evidence, risk awareness, bloodwork basics, hormones, peptides, compounds, and better decision-making.


Question for anyone interested in this space:


What topic do you think has the most misinformation right now?


  1. Peptides

  2. Testosterone / hormones

  3. GLP-1s

  4. Hair-loss meds

  5. Supplements

  6. Bloodwork


Drop your answer below — I’ll use the most common responses to decide what breakdown to post next.

Profile picture
Trent HarrisProfile picture@trentharriszn·Jun 3
Pinned post

Welcome to Biohacking Without the BS 🧬

This space was built for people who are interested in biohacking, peptides, hormones, bloodwork, GLP-1s, and pharmaceutical optimisation - but don’t want hype, fear-mongering, fake guru protocols, or random internet advice.


The goal here is simple:

Learn how to think before making decisions.


Inside the Course Hub, you’ll find:

🧠 Biohacking foundations

🔬 Evidence literacy

🩸 Bloodwork & biomarkers

⚙️ Hormones & endocrine basics

🧬 Peptides 101

💊 Pharmaceutical intervention literacy

⚠️ Risk management

🚩 Myths, misconceptions & red flags

📊 Personal optimisation templates

🧪 Compound Library covering GLP-1s, testosterone, finasteride, GHK-Cu, BPC-157, and more


Important note:

This is not medical advice.

This is not a dosing guide.

This is not a steroid cycle course.

This is not sourcing advice.


It’s an education system designed to help you separate evidence from hype, understand risk, ask better questions, and make more informed decisions with qualified medical professionals.


Start with the Course Hub, read the disclaimer, then go through the modules in order.


Stay curious, but demand evidence.