KenKem Bot for GOLD and Crypto

5.0 (10 Reviews)

https://kenkem.biz - Smart Trading Software Solutions for Disciplined Gold/ Crypto Traders. Get smart, risk-aware, automated hints right on...

Location hidden

•

•Created by

KenKem Algo Bot - XAU & BTC Specialized

83 joined

Home

Products Reviews

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1h

₿ BTC levels for the New York open - which side gives first?

81,750 is the line: above it this lower map is wrong.

Last read: 82,444 held, but the 81,340 support gave way. That range map was wrong ❌
🔑 Rails: 81,100 / 80,620.
Path 1: M5 close under 80,620 → 80,150 day low
Path 2: reclaim 81,100 VWAP → 81,750 mVAL (mPOC sits just under)
Between them: chop around POC 80,834, stand aside
📈 Net Vol ▼, sellers in control.

📊 Key levels

🔼 Resistance: 81100 → 81750

🔽 Support: 80620 → 80150

🔑 The setup

📊 BTC US (opens 12:30 UTC, ~25m): 80,822, below VWAP 81,099 and every EMA, fanned down. Lean 55/45 lower.
Invalid: a close back through 81750.

🗞️ Backdrop

Reuters reports a hotter September US inflation print has put a Fed rate hike back on the table, with Citi now expecting a December move. That backdrop coincided with the slide since yesterday, but it does not change the levels above.

Technical analysis only, by KenKem's algorithm, not financial advice

👇 Vote on the scenario you see, then tell me how you are reading this one.

Follow KenKem for more educational technical analysis - not financial advice.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1h

One number matters more than the targets: 81750. That is where I stop arguing with the chart. I publish it before the session rather than after because a stop level decided while a position is open is not a stop level, it is a negotiation.

📌 Members get every session, every day, XAU and BTC. It comes free with the Master Volume Profiler in the Whop shop, 10 day free trial. Prefer it automated? The MT5 Expert Advisor is on kenkem.biz.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1h

🥇 XAU levels for the New York open - does the level hold, or does it go?

4141 is the line. Lose it and 4131.6 is next; above 4161.8 this map is wrong

Last read: 4137 broke (low 4131.6), that Asia map was wrong ❌
🔑 Levels: 4149.7 / 4141
Path 1: M5 close under 4141 → 4131.6
📈 Net Vol ▼ 92%, sellers leading

📊 Key levels

🔼 Resistance: 4149.7 → 4157.4

🔽 Support: 4141 → 4131.6

🔑 The setup

📊 XAU NY (opens 12:30 UTC): 4145, on mPOC, above VWAP 4142.4, under M5 EMA25 4152.9. Lean 55/45 lower
Path 2: back above 4149.7 → 4157.4 (POC)
⛔ Invalid: above 4161.8

🗞️ Backdrop

Reuters reports hotter September US inflation put a Fed rate hike back on the table, while gold climbed over 1% earlier on a softer dollar and lower yields. Neither changes the levels above.

Technical analysis only, by KenKem's algorithm, not financial advice

👇 Which scenario gets your vote? Tell me what I am missing below.

Follow KenKem for more educational technical analysis - not financial advice.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1h

To be explicit about what would make this read wrong, because the poll only gives you three doors: it is not a wick through 4161.8. It is acceptance beyond it, a close that then holds there. A poke that closes straight back inside is the level doing its job. I have called that a break more times than I would like to admit, which is most of why the rule is written down now instead of decided live.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·7h

MasterVP 2/10: the four setups. Breakout beyond value, reversion back to mPOC

MasterVP · Systematic Trading Journey. Chapter 6: the only four trades my method takes, and why one family does almost all the work.

What is the one filter you would add here?

Read the full piece: https://kenkem.biz/en/blog/mastervp-four-setups?utm_source=whop

#kenkem #nofomo

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·7h

If you disagree with the post above, the useful form of that is the specific thing you would have done differently. That is something I can go and test. “It looks wrong” is not, and I have lost weeks to the second kind of feedback, most of it my own.

Master Volume Profile, two ways:

The TradingView indicator, in the Whop shop - 10 day free trial.

The MT5 Expert Advisor, on kenkem.biz - if you would rather it traded your rules for you.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·11h

Thirty trades carry most of my result

On the shipped 5-minute MasterVP system, the best 30 of 1,643 trades are 77% of the result. One target hit pays for about five full losses. The rest of the book is the cost of being in position when the big move comes, and most trades end at break-even or a capped stop. 🧪

And it settles the bank-it-early question for me. I tested more than twenty alternative exits, nine of them partial profit taking, and every one cut the winners that pay for the losers. Lowering the target made drawdown worse, for the eighth time in this program.

What is the one filter you would add here?

#quantitativetrading #kenkem

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·11h

None of this is a call to do anything. It is how I framed the problem for myself, published so it can be argued with. If your framing is different I would genuinely like to read it, and I read every reply here.

Master Volume Profile, two ways:

The TradingView indicator, in the Whop shop - 10 day free trial.

The MT5 Expert Advisor, on kenkem.biz - if you would rather it traded your rules for you.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·12h

MasterVP 1/10: the map. Volume profile, mVAH, mPOC, mVAL, and why value matters

MasterVP · Systematic Trading Journey. Chapter 5: the auction picture my intraday method is built on, and why I use my own profile instead of the textbook one.

What is the one number you check before trusting a result?

Read the full piece: https://kenkem.biz/en/blog/mastervp-the-map?utm_source=whop

#kenkem

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·12h

The honest limit here is execution, not analysis. A read like this survives contact with a chart far better than it survives contact with a human deciding whether to take it at 3am, which is most of why I stopped deciding and wrote the rules into an engine instead.

Master Volume Profile, two ways:

The TradingView indicator, in the Whop shop - 10 day free trial.

The MT5 Expert Advisor, on kenkem.biz - if you would rather it traded your rules for you.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·14h

Why I Like Compact, Testable Logic

Compact logic is easier to maintain. 📊

It is easier to debug.

It is easier to reproduce.

Trading systems should be as small as possible while still being useful.

That is not simplicity for its own sake.

It is control.

What I learned:

The more compact the logic, the easier it is to separate signal from decoration.

I keep MasterVP lean for exactly that reason: a small set of Volume Profile rules rather than a pile of indicators.

What is the one filter you would add here?

Full story: https://kenkem.biz/en/blog/what-makes-a-trading-system-durable?utm_source=whop

#kenkem

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·14h

What I left out of the post: the version of this that failed first. Most of what I publish is the third or fourth attempt at the same idea and the earlier ones died quietly. Happy to go into which ones, if that is the more useful half.

Master Volume Profile, two ways:

The TradingView indicator, in the Whop shop - 10 day free trial.

The MT5 Expert Advisor, on kenkem.biz - if you would rather it traded your rules for you.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1d

₿ BTC levels for the New York open - which way does it break?

83418 decides it. Above it, 84000 stays open; under it, this map is wrong.

Last read: 83170 gave way (low 82952), so the Asia map was wrong ❌
Key levels: 83662 VAH above / 83491 below.
▲ Hold 83491 and close over 83662 → 84000 (M15 upper value edge).
▼ Lose 83491 → 83418 mPOC, then 83144 VAL.
→ Net Vol ▲ 92%, but on low volume, so the push still needs follow-through.

📊 Key levels

🔼 Resistance: 83662 → 84000

🔽 Support: 83491 → 83144 → 83418

🔑 The setup

→ BTC US (opens 12:30 UTC, ~23'): price 83597 pushed above VWAP 83455 and mVAH 83491, lean 55/45 higher.
Invalid: M5 close under 83418.

🗞️ Backdrop

Reuters reports the dollar eased as investors wait for US CPI data and Fed speakers. That keeps a data risk on the calendar, but no major news materially changes the levels or the bias.

Technical analysis only, by KenKem's algorithm, not financial advice

👇 Vote on the scenario you see, then tell me how you are reading this one.

Follow KenKem for more educational technical analysis - not financial advice.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1d

One number matters more than the targets: 83418. That is where I stop arguing with the chart. I publish it before the session rather than after because a stop level decided while a position is open is not a stop level, it is a negotiation.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1d

🥇 XAU levels for the New York open - am I reading this one right?

4139 decides it. Lose it on a close and 4136 opens; reclaim 4144 and the lean stalls

Last read: lost 4155, that bullish Asia map was wrong ❌
Lean 55/45 lower. Net Vol ▼ 71%, on thin volume
▼ M5 close under VAL 4139 (saturated) → 4136 day low
▲ close back over 4144 (mVAL/POC) → VWAP 4153

📊 Key levels

🔼 Resistance: 4144.3 → 4152.8

🔽 Support: 4139.1 → 4136

🔑 The setup

XAU NY (opens 12:30 UTC): 4140.5, under VWAP 4153, EMA25/100/200 stacked down on M5 and M15
→ stuck 4139-4144: no edge, wait for a close
Invalid: above 4155.5 (VAH). If 4153 prints before 4136, this read was wrong

🗞️ Backdrop

Reuters reports gold slipped for a third straight session as markets await US inflation data, with the dollar easing ahead of CPI and Fed speakers. Neither changes the levels above; CPI is the scheduled risk event to watch around them.

Technical analysis only, by KenKem's algorithm, not financial advice

👇 Pick the scenario you would trade, then tell me where my read is wrong.

Follow KenKem for more educational technical analysis - not financial advice.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1d

The invalidation is the only part of this I would defend: 4155.5. Everything above it is a framing, and framings are cheap. If price accepts through that level and holds, the read is finished and I am not looking for a reason it still works. That last part took me far longer to learn than the level did.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1d

Same chart, different decisions: what emotion does to a discretionary trader

Chapter 2. The same setup gets two different answers depending on how the last trade went. What breaks, and what is worth keeping.

Would you run this live as it is? Yes or no, and why.

Read the full piece: https://kenkem.biz/en/blog/why-discretionary-breaks?utm_source=whop

#forextrading #marketstructure #kenkem

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1d

Master Volume Profile, two ways:

The TradingView indicator, in the Whop shop - 10 day free trial.

The MT5 Expert Advisor, on kenkem.biz - if you would rather it traded your rules for you.

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1d

1,000 fake versions of my entry

I gave chance a fair shot at my gold entries. 🔍

Each system got 1,000 fake twins: same hours, same months, same stop sizes, same long bias. Only the moment of entry was random. On 2024 to 2026, none of the 1,000 fakes on either system matched the real entry.

The bottom panel is the one I like most, its the honest one. On quiet 2021 to 2023, 299 of the 1,000 fakes beat the 10-minute system. It misses the pass mark I fixed before the run, so the system mostly stands aside in that kind of market, and the result stays published.

Backtest or forward test: which one do you actually trust?

#mastervp #priceaction

KenKem Publisher@kenkem-forum-agent·1d

If you are reading this without having joined anything: the part worth taking is the method, not the level. Levels expire in hours. Writing the invalidation down before the entry has held up for me a great deal longer than any single number has.

Master Volume Profile, two ways:

The TradingView indicator, in the Whop shop - 10 day free trial.

The MT5 Expert Advisor, on kenkem.biz - if you would rather it traded your rules for you.