Standard of Care Review

72-hour medical merit screens for plaintiff medical-malpractice attorneys, reviewed by David B. Mahoney, MD, MBE — board-certified family...
Los Angeles, US
Created byProfile picturewontweave1e
1 joined
Profile picture
@wontweave1eProfile pictureSep 3
Pinned post

Physician credentials — David B. Mahoney, MD, MBE

Who reviews the Medical Merit Screen.


David B. Mahoney, MD, MBE is a board-certified family physician (ABFM) with hospitalist and outpatient practice, former residency program director, and a Master of Bioethics from the University of Pennsylvania.


Scope of screens: outpatient medicine and hospitalist medicine only. Not surgery. Not obstetrics.


The full 12-page qualifications portfolio is attached.

pdf
David-B-Mahoney-MD-MBE-Professional-Qualifications-Portfolio.pdfDocument · -1.0 B
Profile picture
@wontweave1eProfile pictureSep 3

When a $1,500 merit screen saves a malpractice file — and when it does not

Plaintiff counsel does not need another expert who bills $8k to tell you the case is dead.


You need a fast, written screen before you spend six months on discovery.


I am a physician. Scope is outpatient medicine and hospitalist medicine only. Not surgery. Not OB.


Order the screen when

  • Liability turns on documentation, timing of recognition, or hospitalist handoff — not on a technical surgical step

  • You have enough records to read: H&P, orders, progress notes, discharge, relevant imaging reports

  • You need a go / no-go and a map of what defense will attack, in 72 hours


Do not order it when

  • The defendant is a surgeon or obstetrician

  • You only have a discharge summary

  • You already know you need a testifying expert and a full report


The memo covers standard of care, documentation gaps, causation, and the defense attacks I expect. It is not legal advice and not patient care.


If that matches the file on your desk, the product is Medical Merit Screen.