MyViewLab

MyViewLab builds rule-based TradingView tools for traders who want cleaner entries, clearer risk, and more structured trade management. From...
Hong Kong, HK
β€’Created byProfile pictureMyViewLab
2 joined
Profile picture
MyViewLabProfile picture@myviewlabΒ·Oct 3

MU 1D | Earnings-day shakeout, reversal close, awaiting follow-through (chart attached)


πŸ“Œ Structure

First Wave: eyeballed from 9/14 (script breakout shows 9/21–9/22, so it is marked as an eyeball call)

Pullback: 9/23–9/30, 6 US trading days (from 9/23)

Reclaim: 10/1 script RC. Closed at 1097.39 (+3.03%), back above the 10MA (about 1067)


πŸ“° 10/1 earnings day

FQ4 revenue of $54.23B and non-GAAP EPS of $33.42 both beat expectations, and FQ1-27 revenue guidance is $61.5B (beat-and-raise). Sold the news after the open, hit an intraday low of 1022.90 (under the 9/28 low of 1032) near the 20MA, then reversed and closed back up.


βœ… Supporting

β€’ 6-day pullback on light volume, about 0.62–0.69x the 50-day average.

β€’ RC-day volume 45.74M, about 1.45x the 50-day average, a clear expansion.

β€’ Intraday break, reversal close and expanding volume together are good supporting evidence.


⚠️ Not supporting / weak points

β€’ The close is still below the 9/25 high, so not a confirmed breakout.

β€’ The First Wave start is an eyeball call.

β€’ Invalidation is the 10/1 shakeout low at 1022.90, about 6.8% below the close.


🧠 One lesson

Judge a shakeout by the close and the volume, not an intraday poke. A reversal still needs follow-through, so do not treat it as confirmed.


πŸ‘€ What to watch next

A close above the 9/25 high confirms it. A close below 1022.90 invalidates the reversal. Follow-up reviews will be added to this same post.


Educational only. Not financial advice. No outcome is guaranteed.

Profile picture
MyViewLab@myviewlabΒ·Oct 8

πŸ”„ Follow-up (10/7): second shakeout, closed back above the 10MA, not yet confirmed


πŸ“‰ What happened

β€’ 10/7: intraday low of about 1011 broke the 1022.90 invalidation, then closed around 1088 (about +4.0%), back above the 10MA.

β€’ This is the second shakeout it closed back from (the first was 10/1).


πŸ“ The rule

Invalidation is a close below 1022.90, not an intraday break. Using the close is how the rule avoids getting shaken out intraday. Not invalidated.


βš–οΈ Compared with SNDK the same day

MU closed back above its 10MA, a stronger shakeout. SNDK closed back above its level but stayed under the 10MA and 20MA, so it is still weak. These two are not equally good.


🧠 Lesson

A stop is never moved lower. If you were stopped out intraday, a re-entry is a new setup: the new low as the stop, risk within about 7%, reward:risk about 2:1 or better before considering it.


πŸ‘€ Next

A close above the 9/25 high = confirmed. A close below 1022.90 = invalid. This post will be updated.


Educational only. Not financial advice. No outcome is guaranteed.

Profile picture
MyViewLabProfile picture@myviewlabΒ·Oct 3

SNDK 1D | Example library: Pullback Reclaim with low RC-day volume (chart attached)


πŸ“Œ Structure

First Wave: 9/18–9/22 (script-defined, not eyeballed)

Pullback: 9/23–9/30, 6 US trading days (counted from 9/23)

Reclaim: 10/1 script RC. Closed at 1787.69 as a bullish candle above the prior close, back above the 10MA (about 1776)


βœ… Supporting

β€’ The 6-day pullback was on light volume, about 0.45–0.59x the 50-day average volume, so selling pressure after the First Wave was small.


⚠️ Not supporting / weak points

β€’ RC-day volume was only about 0.70x the 50-day average. Volume did not confirm, so the odds are lower.

β€’ Invalidation is the 9/28 low at 1659.02, about 7.2% below the 10/1 close, just over 7%. That is a wide distance, so the risk needs to be measured carefully.


🧠 One lesson

A complete structure is only step one. Check whether volume confirms. Low volume does not mean failure, but the odds are lower and you should record that honestly.


πŸ‘€ What to watch next

Does it follow through after the RC: can it hold the 10MA and the 9/28 low at 1659.02? A close below 1659.02 breaks the structure. Follow-up reviews will be added to this same post.


Educational only. Not financial advice. No outcome is guaranteed.

Profile picture
MyViewLab@myviewlabΒ·Oct 8

πŸ”„ Follow-up (10/7): intraday break again, closed back above, still weak


πŸ“‰ What happened

β€’ 10/6: closed at 1660.46, above the 1659.02 invalidation.

β€’ 10/7: intraday low of about 1618 broke 1659.02 again, then closed around 1692, back above it. Still below the 10MA and 20MA.


πŸ“ The rule

Invalidation is a close below 1659.02, not an intraday break. Using the close is how the rule avoids getting shaken out intraday. Not invalidated.


βš–οΈ Compared with MU the same day

MU closed back above its 10MA, a stronger shakeout. SNDK closed back above the level but stayed under both MAs, so it is still weak. These two are not equally good.


🧠 Lesson

A stop is never moved lower. If you were stopped out intraday, a re-entry is a new setup: the new low as the stop, risk within about 7%, reward:risk about 2:1 or better before considering it.


πŸ‘€ Next

Back above the 10MA = improving. A close below 1659.02 = invalid. This post will be updated.


Educational only. Not financial advice. No outcome is guaranteed.