Stop ranking ideas by TAM. Rank them by the first 90 days.
A $40M market does not care that you have $4,000 and 6 hours a week.
I keep seeing the same pattern: someone finds a huge TAM, screenshots a competitor, and calls it research. Then they spend the budget on ads before they know if they can even deliver the first 30 days.
Here is the filter I use instead.
Capital. Write down the cash you can lose without needing a win in week one. If the idea needs 10x that just to launch, it is not an idea. It is a fundraising problem wearing a landing page.
Skills. What can you ship yourself in 30 days? If the plan depends on a specialist you cannot hire yet, the timeline is fiction.
Time. Be honest about hours per week. A "SaaS side project" with 4 hours is a different product than a full-time launch. Same market, different business.
Then look at competitors. Revenue, channels, payback. Label every number as an estimate and give it a confidence level. An unlabeled figure is marketing.
If it still ranks after that, write a 30/60/90 that only uses the money and hours you already have.
That ranking is what Vantr does. Not "here is a hot niche." Here is what you can actually start with the capital, skills, and time you have today.
