You hold governance tokens. A new proposal hits Snapshot. You skim it, it sounds reasonable, you vote Yes.

Three weeks later, the treasury is drained.

This happens more often than you think. Here are 5 red flags I teach my students to catch before casting a single vote:

🚩 1. Vague Deliverables with Specific Budgets

"We'll build community tools" for $500,000. What tools? What timeline? What happens if they don't deliver? If the budget is precise but the scope is foggy, someone is trying to extract value — not create it.

🚩 2. Unreasonably Short Voting Windows

Legitimate proposals give the community time to discuss. If a proposal with major treasury implications has a 24-48 hour voting window, ask yourself: who benefits from rushing this?

🚩 3. Single-Recipient Treasury Transfers

Proposals that route large sums to a single wallet — especially a new one — with no multisig, no vesting, and no milestone-based releases. This is governance 101, yet it still catches communities off guard.

🚩 4. Parameter Changes Buried in Technical Language

"Adjust the collateralization ratio from 150% to 110%." Sounds minor. In reality, this could cascade into protocol-wide liquidations. Always ask: what's the worst-case scenario if this parameter change goes wrong?

🚩 5. The Proposer Has No Governance History

Check their track record. Have they participated in discussions? Voted on previous proposals? Contributed to the DAO in any way? A first-time proposer requesting significant resources is a yellow flag at minimum.

---

These are just the basics. Inside GovVault, I teach a complete framework for reading, analyzing, and safely voting on any DAO proposal — plus wallet security practices that protect you from governance attacks.

If you're tired of feeling lost every time a proposal drops, this is for you.