Following up on my earlier post about the approval-bottleneck problem — I built Greenlight, a review queue for anything your community submits (assignments, contest entries, proof-of-work), so it's not living in scattered DMs and spreadsheets anymore.

It's live now. For the first 10 people who join, I'm locking in founding pricing that won't change for as long as you stay subscribed:

• $49/month (setup fee included: $298 total to start)

• Rate locked for 12 months, no increases

• Full access — submission queue, approve/reject/request-revision, feedback logged with timestamps

Once those 10 spots are gone, this pricing is gone with them.

If you're running a course, contest, or coaching program and you're tired of tracking submissions manually, grab a spot here: https://whop.com/checkout/plan_Dh30MEMSLp1Cu

Happy to answer questions below.

Ran a course + contest whop for a while and the thing that quietly ate the most time wasn't content creation — it was reviewing what members sent back.

Every assignment submission, every contest entry, every "here's my proof I did the work" DM turns into the same manual loop: member sends a link/file in DMs, you screenshot it into a spreadsheet, you reply days later with a verdict, and half the time you've lost track of who you already responded to.

A few patterns I noticed talking to other creators dealing with this:

• Course creators grading assignments end up with a Google Sheet per cohort that nobody maintains past week 2.

• Contest/giveaway hosts review entries in DMs and lose track of who submitted what, leading to disputes over "I submitted mine, where's my prize."

• Coaches verifying client proof-of-work (workouts, trades, homework) have zero paper trail when a client claims they sent something and didn't.

The common thread: none of these are big enough problems on their own to justify custom tooling, so everyone just... doesn't solve it. It stays manual until the community gets big enough that it actively breaks.

If you're running any kind of whop where members submit something for your approval, it's worth asking: do you actually know, right now, how many submissions are sitting unreviewed? Most people don't — because there's no queue, just a scattered inbox.

Curious how others here are handling this at scale. What's your current workaround?