Simple Option Strategies

4.6 (22 Reviews)
Simple Option Strategies is a team of experienced traders delivering real-time trade alerts across SPX 0DTE, Weeklies & Weekly options, and...
Location hidden
β€’
β€’Created byProfile pictureSimple Option Strategies
355 joined
Profile picture
Simple Option StrategiesProfile picture@simpleoptionstrategiesΒ·1d

The Same Strategy, a Different Market Every Day

A quiet, grinding market and a sharp, volatile one both offer credit spread opportunities β€” but they don't offer the same ones, and treating every day identically ignores that.


In calm conditions, premium is thinner and strikes can often sit closer to the money for a similar credit. In volatile conditions, premium is richer but positions need more room, because the same percentage move covers a lot more points.


The rules don't change day to day. What changes is how the market is pricing risk that day, and the strategy is built to read that and size accordingly rather than force yesterday's numbers onto today's market.


Respecting the difference between a calm tape and a volatile one is part of staying disciplined β€” not an excuse to abandon the plan.

The market sets the terms every day. The job is adapting the sizing to those terms, not fighting them.

Profile picture
Simple Option StrategiesProfile picture@simpleoptionstrategiesΒ·2d

Why We Track Every Trade, Win or Lose

It's easy to remember the trades that felt dramatic β€” the big win, the bad loss β€” and let the quiet, routine ones blur together. A real record doesn't get to be selective like memory does.


Tracking every entry, exit, and adjustment is what turns a strategy from a feeling into a fact. It's the only way to actually know if the edge is real, rather than assuming it is because the last few weeks felt good.


A written record also removes the temptation to quietly rewrite history β€” to remember a rule-breaking trade as reasonable in hindsight because it happened to work out.


The goal isn't to relive every trade. It's to make sure the process gets judged by what actually happened, not by what's easiest to remember.


A strategy you can't measure honestly is a strategy you can't actually trust.

Profile picture
Simple Option StrategiesProfile picture@simpleoptionstrategiesΒ·3d

Why We Don't Chase a Better Credit

There's always a version of a trade that pays a little more β€” a strike a bit closer to the money, a spread a bit wider, an entry taken a bit earlier before the setup is confirmed. Chasing that extra credit is one of the most common ways a good process turns into a bad outcome.

A bigger credit almost always means more risk was taken on somewhere else in the trade, even when it doesn't look that way on the surface. The market doesn't hand out free money β€” it hands out compensation for risk, and more compensation usually means more risk.

We set a credit range in advance and stay inside it, on purpose. If the market isn't offering a fair credit at a strike that fits the rules, that's information β€” not a reason to bend the rules to get paid anyway.

Passing on a marginal trade never shows up as a loss. It just quietly protects the account from a bad one.

The trades we don't take are as much a part of the strategy as the ones we do.

Profile picture
Simple Option StrategiesProfile picture@simpleoptionstrategiesΒ·5d

Why Consistency Beats Being Right


You can be right about the market most of the time and still lose money β€” if your winners are small, your losers are big, and your size jumps around based on how confident you feel. Being right is not the same as making money.


Consistency is what turns an edge into a result. Same size every trade. Same rules for entry and exit. Same response to a green week and a red one. It's repetitive on purpose, because the edge is small on any single trade and only compounds if you apply it the same way hundreds of times.


This is also why we don't bend rules for a setup that's almost there. A credit that's close but not in range, a strike that's tempting but off the delta target β€” those get passed. Bending the rule once makes the next exception easier, and pretty soon there are no rules, just feelings.


Boring and consistent wins. Exciting and inconsistent doesn't.

Profile picture
Simple Option StrategiesProfile picture@simpleoptionstrategiesΒ·Oct 9

Why We Don't Stack Similar Trades on Top of Each Other


Two trades can look completely independent and still fail for the exact same reason at the exact same time β€” if they're both short premium on the same underlying in the same direction, a single sharp move can hit both at once.


This is correlation risk, and it's easy to miss because it doesn't show up trade by trade. It only shows up on the one day everything moves together, which is usually the worst possible day for it to be a surprise.


Spreading trades across different expirations, different strategies, and different account roles isn't just for variety β€” it's specifically so one bad move in SPX can't hit every position in the exact same way at the exact same time.


A portfolio of trades that all win and lose together isn't really a portfolio. It's one trade wearing several disguises.

Real diversification means asking what actually moves these positions, not just how many of them there are.

Profile picture
Simple Option StrategiesProfile picture@simpleoptionstrategiesΒ·Oct 8

Risk and Uncertainty Aren't the Same Thing


Uncertainty is not knowing what's going to happen. Risk is what it costs you if the thing that happens is the bad one. Trading always involves uncertainty β€” nobody knows where SPX closes tomorrow β€” but risk is something that can actually be controlled.


A defined-risk spread doesn't reduce uncertainty about where the market goes. It puts a hard ceiling on what that uncertainty can cost, no matter which way it breaks.


Confusing the two leads to bad decisions β€” either avoiding a perfectly reasonable trade because the outcome is unknown (it's always unknown), or taking on too much risk because a setup "feels" likely to work.


The goal was never to eliminate not-knowing. It was to make sure not-knowing can never cost more than the plan already accounted for.


Trade the uncertainty. Just don't let it turn into risk you didn't choose on purpose.

Profile picture
Simple Option StrategiesProfile picture@simpleoptionstrategiesΒ·Oct 7

Rolling a Position Isn't Avoiding a Loss β€” It's Managing One


When a short strike gets challenged, there are really only two honest choices: close it and take whatever the loss is right now, or roll it to a new strike and give the trade more room to work.


Rolling isn't a way to avoid ever losing. It's a way of buying time and distance when the trade still has a reasonable chance to recover, using the same defined process every time instead of a gut decision made under pressure.


The mistake is rolling out of hope rather than out of a rule. A roll should move the strike a meaningful distance away and often collect a bit more credit β€” if a roll doesn't genuinely improve the position, it's just delaying an outcome that was going to happen anyway.


Sometimes the right answer really is to take the loss. A mechanical roll rule exists so that decision gets made by the plan, not by how the day feels.


Either way, the point is the same: the decision was made in advance, not improvised in the moment.

Profile picture
Al LosadaProfile picture@allosadaΒ·Oct 6

Managing Risk Before the Trade Goes Bad, Not After


Most risk management happens too late. The position is already deep in trouble, the loss is already large, and now someone's trying to figure out what to do. By that point every choice is a bad one.


Real risk management is front-loaded. It's the size you chose, the distance you gave the strike, the exit you defined, the fact that this one trade can't take down the account no matter what happens. All of that work is done before entry, when you're calm and nothing is at stake.


When we roll a position, we're not reacting to a loss β€” we're moving before the loss gets there. Price gets close to a short strike, we close that side and reopen it further away, resetting the room to breathe. It's a small, unemotional adjustment made early, not a rescue mission.


If your risk plan only kicks in once you're already hurting, it's not a plan. It's damage control.

Profile picture
Al LosadaProfile picture@allosadaΒ·Oct 5

Position Sizing: The Trade You Size Wrong Is the One That Hurts


Every trade has a "right" size and a size that's too big. The setup can be perfect and still hurt you badly if the size is wrong β€” not because the strategy failed, but because a normal, expected loss became one that actually mattered.


The instinct is to size a trade based on how confident you feel. A setup that looks great gets bigger, a shakier one gets smaller. That's backwards. Confidence isn't information the market cares about, and it's exactly what inflates size right before a loss that was always going to happen eventually.


The right size gets decided the same way every time, before you know whether the trade wins or loses: what can this account absorb if this exact trade is the one that doesn't work? Not "probably won't" β€” does not. If that answer isn't comfortable, the size is wrong no matter how good the setup looks.


A strategy with a real edge can survive a string of losses. What it can't survive is one oversized trade sized on a feeling instead of a rule.

Profile picture
Simple Option StrategiesProfile picture@simpleoptionstrategiesΒ·Oct 4

Hi everyone! For one day, get 50% off the first month of one of our regular monthly subscriptions with code SOS50DAY. Open to new and existing members when purchasing an eligible plan through checkout. Only 100 total redemptions across all five plans, one use per person. Offer ends October 5, 2026 at 5:28 PM Eastern, or when all 100 uses are claimed, whichever comes first.


Choose your plan and enter SOS50DAY at checkout:


Day Trader: $49.50 first month, then $99/month β€”


Pro Trader: $114.50 first month, then $229/month β€”


Full Time Trader: $64.50 first month, then $129/month β€”


Futures Trade: $94.50 first month, then $189/month β€”


SOS Stock Picks: $19.99 first month, then $39.99/month β€”


The discount applies to the first payment only. Existing subscriptions keep their current pricing. This replaces our earlier TRADERUPGRADE99 offer; use SOS50DAY for this promotion. β€” Al, Simple Option Strategies