Simple Option Strategies

4.6 (22 Reviews)

Simple Option Strategies is a team of experienced traders delivering real-time trade alerts across SPX 0DTE, Weeklies & Weekly options, and...

Location hidden

•

•Created by

Simple Option Strategies

352 joined

Home

Products Reviews

Simple Option Strategies

@simpleoptionstrategies·5h

Why Consistency Beats Being Right

You can be right about the market most of the time and still lose money — if your winners are small, your losers are big, and your size jumps around based on how confident you feel. Being right is not the same as making money.

Consistency is what turns an edge into a result. Same size every trade. Same rules for entry and exit. Same response to a green week and a red one. It's repetitive on purpose, because the edge is small on any single trade and only compounds if you apply it the same way hundreds of times.

This is also why we don't bend rules for a setup that's almost there. A credit that's close but not in range, a strike that's tempting but off the delta target — those get passed. Bending the rule once makes the next exception easier, and pretty soon there are no rules, just feelings.

Boring and consistent wins. Exciting and inconsistent doesn't.

Simple Option Strategies

@simpleoptionstrategies·3d

Why We Don't Stack Similar Trades on Top of Each Other

Two trades can look completely independent and still fail for the exact same reason at the exact same time — if they're both short premium on the same underlying in the same direction, a single sharp move can hit both at once.

This is correlation risk, and it's easy to miss because it doesn't show up trade by trade. It only shows up on the one day everything moves together, which is usually the worst possible day for it to be a surprise.

Spreading trades across different expirations, different strategies, and different account roles isn't just for variety — it's specifically so one bad move in SPX can't hit every position in the exact same way at the exact same time.

A portfolio of trades that all win and lose together isn't really a portfolio. It's one trade wearing several disguises.

Real diversification means asking what actually moves these positions, not just how many of them there are.

Simple Option Strategies

@simpleoptionstrategies·4d

Risk and Uncertainty Aren't the Same Thing

Uncertainty is not knowing what's going to happen. Risk is what it costs you if the thing that happens is the bad one. Trading always involves uncertainty — nobody knows where SPX closes tomorrow — but risk is something that can actually be controlled.

A defined-risk spread doesn't reduce uncertainty about where the market goes. It puts a hard ceiling on what that uncertainty can cost, no matter which way it breaks.

Confusing the two leads to bad decisions — either avoiding a perfectly reasonable trade because the outcome is unknown (it's always unknown), or taking on too much risk because a setup "feels" likely to work.

The goal was never to eliminate not-knowing. It was to make sure not-knowing can never cost more than the plan already accounted for.

Trade the uncertainty. Just don't let it turn into risk you didn't choose on purpose.

Simple Option Strategies

@simpleoptionstrategies·5d

Rolling a Position Isn't Avoiding a Loss — It's Managing One

When a short strike gets challenged, there are really only two honest choices: close it and take whatever the loss is right now, or roll it to a new strike and give the trade more room to work.

Rolling isn't a way to avoid ever losing. It's a way of buying time and distance when the trade still has a reasonable chance to recover, using the same defined process every time instead of a gut decision made under pressure.

The mistake is rolling out of hope rather than out of a rule. A roll should move the strike a meaningful distance away and often collect a bit more credit — if a roll doesn't genuinely improve the position, it's just delaying an outcome that was going to happen anyway.

Sometimes the right answer really is to take the loss. A mechanical roll rule exists so that decision gets made by the plan, not by how the day feels.

Either way, the point is the same: the decision was made in advance, not improvised in the moment.

Al Losada

@allosada·6d

Managing Risk Before the Trade Goes Bad, Not After

Most risk management happens too late. The position is already deep in trouble, the loss is already large, and now someone's trying to figure out what to do. By that point every choice is a bad one.

Real risk management is front-loaded. It's the size you chose, the distance you gave the strike, the exit you defined, the fact that this one trade can't take down the account no matter what happens. All of that work is done before entry, when you're calm and nothing is at stake.

When we roll a position, we're not reacting to a loss — we're moving before the loss gets there. Price gets close to a short strike, we close that side and reopen it further away, resetting the room to breathe. It's a small, unemotional adjustment made early, not a rescue mission.

If your risk plan only kicks in once you're already hurting, it's not a plan. It's damage control.

Al Losada

@allosada·Oct 5

Position Sizing: The Trade You Size Wrong Is the One That Hurts

Every trade has a "right" size and a size that's too big. The setup can be perfect and still hurt you badly if the size is wrong — not because the strategy failed, but because a normal, expected loss became one that actually mattered.

The instinct is to size a trade based on how confident you feel. A setup that looks great gets bigger, a shakier one gets smaller. That's backwards. Confidence isn't information the market cares about, and it's exactly what inflates size right before a loss that was always going to happen eventually.

The right size gets decided the same way every time, before you know whether the trade wins or loses: what can this account absorb if this exact trade is the one that doesn't work? Not "probably won't" — does not. If that answer isn't comfortable, the size is wrong no matter how good the setup looks.

A strategy with a real edge can survive a string of losses. What it can't survive is one oversized trade sized on a feeling instead of a rule.

Simple Option Strategies

@simpleoptionstrategies·Oct 4

Hi everyone! For one day, get 50% off the first month of one of our regular monthly subscriptions with code SOS50DAY. Open to new and existing members when purchasing an eligible plan through checkout. Only 100 total redemptions across all five plans, one use per person. Offer ends October 5, 2026 at 5:28 PM Eastern, or when all 100 uses are claimed, whichever comes first.

Choose your plan and enter SOS50DAY at checkout:

Day Trader: $49.50 first month, then $99/month — https://whop.com/checkout/plan_bl0zWXKvro1fd

Pro Trader: $114.50 first month, then $229/month — https://whop.com/checkout/plan_syt6ay2sNSZYE

Full Time Trader: $64.50 first month, then $129/month — https://whop.com/checkout/plan_osHnHo1AK5SiK

Futures Trade: $94.50 first month, then $189/month — https://whop.com/checkout/plan_4Nb51lC1qYEYU

SOS Stock Picks: $19.99 first month, then $39.99/month — https://whop.com/checkout/plan_hnNXUZ46rIApS

The discount applies to the first payment only. Existing subscriptions keep their current pricing. This replaces our earlier TRADERUPGRADE99 offer; use SOS50DAY for this promotion. — Al, Simple Option Strategies

Simple Option Strategies

@simpleoptionstrategies·Oct 2

A Quick Note From Al – SOS Members

Hi everyone,

Yesterday, Whop's Economic Intelligence AI system sent several automated promotional and billing-related messages to members of our community.

Some of you may have received upgrade offers even though you already have an active paid subscription. A few messages also contained incorrect information about our membership plans.

These messages were generated through an AI campaign, and I apologize for any confusion.

We are cleaning up the unwanted promotions and reviewing what happened.

Please disregard any upgrade message that does not apply to your current membership. There is no need to purchase another subscription if you already have the access you need.

Our regular trading alerts and services are continuing as usual.

Thank you for your understanding and for being part of SOS!

Al Losada

Simple Option Strategies

@simpleoptionstrategies·Oct 1

Why the Width of the Spread Isn't an Afterthought

A credit spread's width decides two things at once: how much can be lost if the trade fails completely, and how much capital gets tied up to make the trade. Neither of those should be an afterthought to "what credit can I get."

A wider spread often pays a bigger credit, but it also means a bigger max loss sitting behind that credit. Chasing a better-looking number on the credit side while ignoring what it costs on the risk side is how a "good" trade quietly becomes a bad one.

We pick width first as a function of what the account can tolerate losing on any single position, then look at what credit that width actually offers — not the other way around.

A trade that pays a little less but keeps risk in proportion to the account is a better trade than one that pays more and doesn't.

The credit is what you notice. The width is what actually determines whether a bad day is survivable.

Simple Option Strategies

@simpleoptionstrategies·Sep 30

Why We're Sellers of Premium, Not Buyers

Buying an option means paying for the chance something big happens before expiration. It's a lottery ticket with a defined cost and, most of the time, a defined disappointment — most options expire worth less than what was paid for them.

Selling premium flips that math. Instead of needing a big move to happen, we get paid up front and need the big move to not happen — a bar the market clears far more often than it fails.

That doesn't mean selling premium is free money. It means giving up unlimited upside in exchange for a statistical edge, and controlling risk with defined-width spreads so no single trade can wipe out the account.

It's a trade-off, not a magic trick: smaller, more consistent gains in exchange for capping how big any single win can be.

Over enough trades, that trade-off is exactly what turns a probability edge into a track record.